I was assigned Sarah Riedel as conflict counsel after I declared a conflict with the public defender’s office. Unfortunately, her representation left me feeling abandoned and betrayed. Despite knowing the facts of my case — including a defective probable cause affidavit, prosecutorial misconduct, ex parte communications between the ADA and judge, and evidence suppression — Ms. Riedel filed no motions, raised no objections, and failed to advocate on my behalf. She also did not challenge judicial bias when the court refused to accept my pro se filings, leaving me in a constitutional vacuum where I had no attorney acting for me and was not permitted to represent myself. Her silence in the face of these issues gave the appearance of collusion with the prosecution and the court, rather than loyalty to her client. Instead of defending me, she appeared to stand aside so that the State’s objectives could proceed unchallenged. The Sixth Amendment guarantees not just the presence of an attorney, but a loyal advocate. I did not have that in Ms. Riedel. My experience with her was one of inaction, silence, and ineffective assistance, and it contributed directly to the pressure I felt to plead guilty simply to move forward. She also perjured herself in testimony. She is probably one of the worst attorneys in the Oconee Judicial Circuit. She knew the Judge Sarah Wall and DA Tim Vaughn and ADA Brad Childers were acting corruptly and she chose to remain silent. SHE WILL NOT ADVOCATE FOR YOU, EVER. If you need an attorney who will actually fight for you, I cannot recommend her.
Analyzing Data...