This review is based on my direct experience in litigation where Michael Murphy represented McDonald’s. My complaint was filed on December 30, 2024. McDonald’s had a clear deadline of March 1, 2025 to respond. That deadline passed without a response. Instead, an extension was later granted moving the deadline to April 11, 2025, despite the fact that I did not authorize or consent to any extension, which unnecessarily delayed the case. Since then, settlement negotiations have stalled, even though McDonald’s previously made an $7,000 settlement offer. From my perspective, progress stopped once delays were introduced, and the strategy shifted to prolonging litigation rather than resolving it. For an individual litigant facing a large corporate defense, this type of delay tactic is exhausting and damaging. Deadlines matter. Consent matters. Good-faith negotiation matters. If you are dealing with this attorney, do not assume timelines will be honored, insist on everything in writing, and monitor every deadline yourself. Expect a defense strategy focused on delay rather than resolution.
Analyzing Data...