CrashStory is loading the review analysis, rating patterns, and detailed client feedback for this law firm.
Review Intelligence
Mumford Law Savannah Ga review signals at a glance
CrashStory aggregates public review patterns for Mumford Law Savannah Ga so readers can assess client sentiment, response quality, and the issues that appear most often before moving deeper into the interactive review explorer.
Average Rating
4.5
Total Reviews
40
PI Reviews
32
Text Reviews
40
Most common themes
Police MisconductCorruption
Ready to talk? Request a free case review from Mumford Law Savannah Ga.
What to check before you hire Mumford Law Savannah Ga
This review summary is rendered directly in the page HTML so readers and crawlers can see the newest review signals, common strengths, and questions to verify even before the interactive explorer loads.
Review Snapshot
4.5
44 public reviews and 40 written reviews.
Recent Activity
Most recent written review from Beverley Husted: Dec 5, 2025 (285 days ago)
Compare this recency with the other firms you are considering, not just the star rating.
Response Behavior
Replies on 16% of reviews
71% of the visible replies look at least somewhat personalized instead of fully templated.
Mumford Law Savannah Ga client reviews
Recent written reviews appear first. The full interactive review explorer — with sentiment, dimension tags, and complete history — loads below.
Multi-tag filters use OR matching across all assigned classification tags.
7d0 reviews
-
14d0 reviews
-
30d0 reviews
-
All40 reviews
4.5
Most recent written review from Beverley Husted: Dec 5, 2025 (285 days ago)
Written Reviews
40
Average Rating
4.50
Reviews (30d)
0
Reviews (90d)
0
Older Archive
40
Assigned Tags (3)
Showing 40 of 40 written reviews.
1 star
5
2 star
0
3 star
0
4 star
0
5 star
35
Older Written Reviews
Reviews older than 30 days are kept available in pages of 12.
Roland Mumford has been amazing to work with! He is very straightforward which I respect and appreciate. My case isn’t finished yet, but he’s already made the whole process so much less stressful. I never feel rushed or brushed off, he genuinely listens. I’m really grateful for how supportive he’s been so far, and I feel totally confident with him handling my case.
-Highly recommend
Mr Roland took my case after I felt like I was wrongfully terminated from my job. He worked very hard and diligently on my case. He worked on my case for over a year before my case was settled and I felt like he handle my case very professional and got it resolved. I would recommend Mr Roland to anybody who has felt like they have been wrongfully terminated.
Mr. Mumford is plaintiff's attorney in my recently filed case in U.S. court against a Lumpkin County, GA, sheriff's deputy for constitutional rights violations. After hiring 4 local area attorneys, including those who blatantly protected the Lumpkin County, GA, Sheriff's Office to my detriment, Mr. Mumford's honesty, competence and concern are a breath of fresh air. While it's not possible to accurately predict the outcome of any case presented to a jury, we have no doubt Mr. Mumford is the "right attorney" to help us pursue justice.
Currently being represented by Mr. Roland
Felt the need to give people my honest opinion.
Roland is very thorough. He is very keen on the corruption within Police departments/sheriff/district attorney covering up evidence. These cases take time and he has the patience to deal with these issues.
If you need a lawyer you don’t have to question if he’s representing you or the other side this is your man. He has not fallen to the dark side.. He will be representing you and your interest.
I have definitely recommended him to others.
So far things have been moving very smoothly and I am impressed. I will keep people posted on further progress. Thank you for letting me share my opinion
Choosing Mumford Law Firm was the best decision I've ever made. He gave me excellent legal advice and everything he said was going to happen, happened. He is very patient, concise, and pays attention to detail. When it comes to my case, he took all of my ideas that were out of order and placed them in order chronologically. I would definitely recommend him for your legal needs. Excellent choice.
My experience with this attorney was not what I hoped for. In my initial conversations with him, his demeanor came across as rude and unnecessarily aggressive. While he may view his style as “direct,” there is a clear difference between being straightforward and being abrasive, and I felt that distinction was not respected. As someone who just experienced a personal loss of a family member, As well, as attempting to juggle this legal manner. I often not find comfort in our interactions.
Despite several family members and others advising me not to proceed, I chose to give him a fair chance because I try not to judge anyone based solely on first impressions. Looking back, I should have trusted my instincts.
At one point, I mentioned the name of the law firm I would be moving forward with, but only in a general sense. Rather than verifying the details with me, he sent private information to an entirely different law firm with the same last name. This happened because he assumed it was the local firm instead of confirming which firm I meant. That kind of presumptive action felt careless and unnecessary.
I would strongly advise potential clients not to rely on my experience alone.
Please schedule and pay for your own, and decide for yourself. I paid in full for mine, so my review has nothing to do with fees, despite how often he references money in his responses to other reviews. His replies to clients or perspective clients and others publicly, often come across as curt or dismissive.
Communication throughout my experience was inconsistent. I had to resend information and remind him of evidence I had already provided. This did not build confidence in his commitment or ability to manage my case. Ultimately, he declined further representation after I expressed my honest thoughts And shared that my case did not have merit in which she felt would be winnable. I respect his decision as he is an attorney and that is his field and his choice, this review is not because of that.
While he may frame his decision as based on legal reasons, from my perspective it seemed connected to personal comfort and emotional responses. Everyone has their own style, but in my situation, I did not feel supported in a professional or steady way. And honestly, throughout the process, I was constantly questioning my decision to move forward with his practice.
Still, every person’s experience may differ. If you do decide to work with him, I genuinely hope it is a better experience than mine, because dealing with these personality dynamics while managing a legal matter can be very disheartening.
However, I do wish him well in his personal matters and in his life. Just speaking on my experience alone.
Owner response
Attorney client privilege prevents me from discussing other facts to rebut this defamatory and false post. This review was posted after requesting a fee. If you review all my positive posts those are actual clients that we represented through full litigation. The negative posts here are not clients and rather are people that retaliate with negative reviews because we did not take their case or wanted a free consultation and refused to pay our consultation fee. This was a limited client experience and I am very honest and direct about my opinions about people's cases and tell you like it is. It is unfortunate that google allows such posts knowing attorneys cannot defend themselves due to issues of privilege and confidentiality. This was not a full attorney client relationship with litigation or a long tenured relationship. All the five star reviews you read on here were from actual long term clients. The statement about resending documents is a false statement.
My experience with this lawyer was very disappointing. He was rude, constantly spoke over me, and wouldn’t take the time to actually listen to my case. Instead of offering any real legal guidance, he quickly jumped to asking if I could pay a $250 consultation fee for two hours — even mentioning he might only be able to use the video for his YouTube channel to get back at the police who pulled me over. I left feeling completely unheard and unhelped. I would not recommend this attorney to anyone looking for a professional or respectful experience.
Owner response
Another retaliatory post by someone who wants a free consultation. I practically provided this person a free consultation as we went through the entire story. I asked numerous questions. I heard the story. We quoted a 250.00 fee for up to two hour of our time to order the police video to determine the merits of the claim. I have to pay a paralegal to do work. I get 5 to 8 prospect calls per day and I cannot spend 2 to 3 hours investigating every call. In fact I usually charge 250.00 for time I gave this person. This is another free loader who thinks attorneys are supposed to work for free consistent with all the other one star reviews. Please ignore these reviews as they are not clients. Yes I manage the calls by asking direct questions as I don’t have time each day for 5-8 people to tell me their life story or information that is not relevant. It is arrogant to think you can call a lawyer and dictate how a phone call should go. This person is on my time seeking my help. I have to keep conversation on point. This person simply did not want to pay for my time. The 240.00 was for two hours of my time to do open records requests and investigate the matter. It is crazy to think I should do that for free. Please read the five star reviews from actual clients. Not free loaders expecting a handout. <br>
I couldn't ask for a better lawyer. If you're looking for an lawyer that knows the law, look no further. The worst part is that he can't be divided in to a hundred pieces to help everyone. So if you have been wronged, know that you are looking at someone that can make it right.
Roland was very professional and helped me out with my nasty divorce case over a three year period. Excellent lawyer and would highly recommend for your lawyer needs.
I’ve had a great experience working with Roland at this law firm. When I was searching for an attorney and facing a deadline, Roland responded to my inquiry promptly. He provided me with detailed information about the pros and cons of my case and was completely transparent, ensuring I understood all aspects. Since taking on my case, Roland has been consistently responsive, answering any questions I have in a timely manner. He takes the time to clearly explain the process and what everything means. Roland is not only knowledgeable and professional but also courteous and approachable. I highly recommend his services.
My wife and I had a situation. Were a lawyer is required. We talk to multiple lawyers about our situation. Most stated they was to busy. Others stated that we didn't have a case. Yet, most of them didn't look at the evidence. Mr. Mumford looked at the evidence we had with an open mind. He also spend 2 hours on a zoom call with us to discuss our case. Then took time out of his schedule to actually meet us. Not to discuss our case per say. But to get to know us for who are. We are very glad to have someone take our case. That's actually understands how serious it really is! We are just getting started. Hopefully it will be resolved in our favor.
Roland is a great attorney. He has taken two of my cases. One being employment and the other being personal injury. Just trust him and he will give you great legal advice and guidance.
Roland Mumford has been amazing to work with! He is very straightforward which I respect and appreciate. My case isn’t finished yet, but he’s already made the whole process so much less stressful. I never feel rushed or brushed off, he genuinely listens. I’m really grateful for how supportive he’s been so far, and I feel totally confident with him handling my case.
-Highly recommend
Mr Roland took my case after I felt like I was wrongfully terminated from my job. He worked very hard and diligently on my case. He worked on my case for over a year before my case was settled and I felt like he handle my case very professional and got it resolved. I would recommend Mr Roland to anybody who has felt like they have been wrongfully terminated.
Mr. Mumford is plaintiff's attorney in my recently filed case in U.S. court against a Lumpkin County, GA, sheriff's deputy for constitutional rights violations. After hiring 4 local area attorneys, including those who blatantly protected the Lumpkin County, GA, Sheriff's Office to my detriment, Mr. Mumford's honesty, competence and concern are a breath of fresh air. While it's not possible to accurately predict the outcome of any case presented to a jury, we have no doubt Mr. Mumford is the "right attorney" to help us pursue justice.