CrashStory is loading the review analysis, rating patterns, and detailed client feedback for this law firm.
Review Intelligence
Dhf Law P.C. Alhambra Ca review signals at a glance
CrashStory aggregates public review patterns for Dhf Law P.C. Alhambra Ca so readers can assess client sentiment, response quality, and the issues that appear most often before moving deeper into the interactive review explorer.
Average Rating
4.4
Total Reviews
48
PI Reviews
32
Text Reviews
48
Ready to talk? Request a free case review from Dhf Law P.C. Alhambra Ca.
What to check before you hire Dhf Law P.C. Alhambra Ca
This review summary is rendered directly in the page HTML so readers and crawlers can see the newest review signals, common strengths, and questions to verify even before the interactive explorer loads.
Review Snapshot
4.6
68 public reviews and 48 written reviews.
Recent Activity
Most recent written review from Leo Little Hawk: Dec 21, 2025 (319 days ago)
Compare this recency with the other firms you are considering, not just the star rating.
Response Behavior
Replies on 7% of reviews
60% of the visible replies look at least somewhat personalized instead of fully templated.
Dhf Law P.C. Alhambra Ca client reviews
Recent written reviews appear first. The full interactive review explorer — with sentiment, dimension tags, and complete history — loads below.
Multi-tag filters use OR matching across all assigned classification tags.
7d0 reviews
-
14d0 reviews
-
30d0 reviews
-
All48 reviews
4.4
Most recent written review from Leo Little Hawk: Dec 21, 2025 (319 days ago)
Written Reviews
48
Average Rating
4.42
Reviews (30d)
0
Reviews (90d)
0
Older Archive
48
Assigned Tags (3)
Showing 48 of 48 written reviews.
1 star
7
2 star
0
3 star
0
4 star
0
5 star
41
Older Written Reviews
Reviews older than 30 days are kept available in pages of 12.
Please read edited section at end of review addressing Attorney's unethical behavior and toothless threats made to his own clients in order to manipulate them.
This review is 100 percent truthful and accurate, and despite the attorney's effirts here to appear as if he is "suing for defamation," the SUBSTANTIAL TRUTH IS AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE TO BOTH DEGAMATION AND LIBEL CLAIMS.
This attorney failed to file multiple, 4 or more, lawsuits by the statute of limitations due to negligence costing me in his own words at least 40 to 60k each.
Some more, with other factors added in, were over six figures likely.
Further, I discovered HE HAS NO INSURANCE AND HAS TOLD NONE OF HIS CLIENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE BAR.
Please if you have used this attorney or are a client you can reach out to me for help.
IF THIS ATTORNEY WORKED WITH YOU WITH NO INSURANCE AND DID NOT TELL YOU IT IS A VIOLATION, UNETHICAL, AND IT VOIDED YOUR FEE SCHEDULE WITH HIM.
He had NO RIGHT TO ANY PERCENTAGE OF YOUR MONEY.
He is STILL WORKING WITH NO INSURANCE.
He also FAILED TO FOLLOW MY WISHES and made two depositions, that HURT US, tanked one case, and is trying to charge me for them, with additional fees just added as punitive measures to try to force me from not pursuing my claim with the bar.
Worst of all, on another case he failed to keep contact, return contact urging him to follow up on a settlement meeting where he gave bad advice based on his lack of knowledge for my case, but then DID NOT ANSWER A MOTION FROM OPPOSING COUNCIL AND MY CASE WAS DISMISSED DUE TO HIS NEGLIGENCE.
Worse he never notified me at all, and then appealed the dismissal without telling me, lost again, and tried to hide this from me and never intended to tell me.
This attorney exhibited sociopathic behavior based on lack of concern for all clients as they can not recover their losses after his bad acts due to not having insurance, and did not tell them.
Any business partner, financial institutions or banks, attorneys working with him, all are at risk do to his behavior.
Again, as during the case when I discovered Mr. Fok had been careless, missed multiple deadlines and filing dates, and due to his errors my case was dismissed as well as an appeal he failed to notify me of - attorneys are required by law and ethics to notify you of substantial issues arising in your case and opposition filings, case dismissal and filing of appeals are certainly paramount in that class - this attorney has taken to threats to his own client to attempt to hide his shortcomings and misdeeds.
Mr. Fok is free to file any claim he wishes, but the court files alone show that the case was dismissed due to his errors, and he has admitted this in writing not only to myself but the California Bar - where the CRU currently has this case.
First off, this is not "Mr. Wilt" as you refer me to.
Seconly, this is no where near a "new" account.
Attorney Fok continues to threaten and intimidate.
As far as ANY person posting ANY negative review of you it is perfectly legal and appropriate one is aware of your transgressions and can provide a valid example of them.
Period.
The truth is a valid defence.
Pethaps YOU should not have folks post false "5 star" reviews or give people "incentives" to do so.
That said, bless your heart.
I too have personal knowledge of Attorney Fok not informing his clients that he did not have insurance. This is a serious violation of the bar statutes.
Attorney Fok has indeed on multiple occasions not met deadlines or responded to the court costing his clients money and resulting in their cases being thrown out.
He also has overcharged clients and threatens his clients should they seek to report him.
What I have read here is very factual.
Owner response
Mr. Wilt, you need to stop creating new accounts and leaving me 1 star reviews. I will see you in court.
Attorney has a history of missing deadlines with the court that causes case dismissal due to his error. Communication with this attorney is awful.
I see that Mr. FOK has threatened me.
This review is 100 percent truthful.
I am sure any of the people leaving similar reviews can validate that indeed Mr. Fok has done just this, missed deadlines, statutes of limitations, and failed to respond to opposing parties causing cases to be dismissed.
These actions are also documented on other websites.
Mr. Fok also has abused his power by threatening his own clients with "legal action" should they report him, which is both unethical and illegal.
This can be proved as well.
These threats are meaningless as all I have to do is provide ONE example of this.
And that, is easy.
Stop threatening people and instead do right by your clients.
Owner response
I have never represented you. Please do not defame me online or I will take full legal action. Unless you are Mr. Wilt who is creating the different accounts to intentionally harm my business.
DHF Law went above and beyond for me. Not only did they settle my case in a timely manner but they helped me get to the root of the problem. I put my complete trust in Devin and Josh, and they did not disappoint. If you're looking for an team that will not only represent you the right way, but have open communication with you throughout the process, your search ends right here!!
I highly recommend DHF Law. Devin has settled in 3 different lawsuits for me with an amount that I was pleased with!
The process took over two years. Devin and his team are transparent and will explain your options and your estimated chances of success or failure so that you know how to proceed moving forward.
If there’s anymore frivolous mistakes during a background I will definitely be using DHF Law again!
I called Devin frantic because of what happened and didn’t know what to do, he called me back with answers and took care of my case. He took notes and explained everything that would happen step by step. I appreciate him for taking care of my case and helping me.
Amazing and very easy to work with. My case involves some unlawful reporting that caused me to not get the position. After speaking with Mr. Devin Fok and his team I was resurred that what happened to me shouldn't have. Our case took time and definitely alot of patience. We settled and the process and very simple working with him. I had no issues with communication. I would recommend him and his firm any day to any of my friends and family with any related issues. Thank you again Mr. Devin Fok, your hard work does not go unnoticed.
I entered into an agreement with the attorney to represent me on several matters relating to credit errors with all three bureaus and multiple background check companies that have caused me adverse action.
It was CLEAR at the onset of the agreement that there were multiple actions that needed addressed that had deadlines before the others.
There was an ENOURMOUS number of filings, documents and filed disputes as well as multiple background reports full of obvious errors that needed attention.
The attorney agreed and took the case on a 33 and 1/3 contingency fee.
However, it seems the attorney and his office due to a lack of communication between the employees within it and failure to respond to contacts from myself may have missed multiple deadlines to file these at the needed time.
This was discovered during a hearing in April 2025 when dealing with a lawsuit concerning Trans Union with a SPECIFIC incident when the attorney instructed me to not take an offer as it would bar me from seeking recompense in the other matters. It was at that time, the attorney looked at the other issues and noted that he had missed multiple deadlines and his reaction was obvious that he knew his office had committed multiple mistakes. At that time, and during the immediate day prior and that morning, the attorney “blamed” his office manager and told me I should have given information to him.
However, I had REPEATEDLY on many prior occasions attempted to talk to him regarding these topics over the prior year and a half
I made it CLEAR to the office manager multiple times I was DEEPLY concerned with the lack of communication within the office and the lack of knowledge the lawyer would have of my case when speaking to him.d evidence for the matters he did not address and the cases he was attempting to settle at a conference that day on SEVERAL occasions via email and through a google case file that the office had access to.
I had supplied much of the information he was scrambling at the last minute to review through both the discovery process and through the aforementioned methods well prior to the hearing. He was not prepared and sent me a stream of continuous and demanding emails over and over the evening prior and the morning of a settlement conference
The attorney attempted to make multiple excuses when he realized he had made a mistake during “down” time during the settlement conference that very well could be construed as malpractice when he saw the dates he had missed due to his lack of diligence and poor communication. He also had given me bad advice not to settle as he had based his opinion on his lack of knowledge regarding the timeline of the case
The attorney settled a matter with one company during the meeting but has not met the deadlines set by the court to provide a document to move forward
I have made many attempts via email and text to reach him and ask him to address these issues, but he will not answer in writing to any request that I make.
He has, through email, instead of answering the questions “dodged them,” said he did not have them despite the questions being in the email trail MULTIPLE times.
The reason I was not available is because I had medical appointments three hours away and an autistic son to care for during that time because – HIS OFFICE HAD RESCHEULED DEPOSITIONS FOR ME THAT WERE CANCELLED AND THEY DID NOT NOTIFY ME OF THE CANCELLATION.
As a single disabled father in cancer treatment with a disabled son, it is difficult for me to maintain appointments like this. On TWO OCCASIONS the office forced me to reschedule these day long appointments for treatment and scans and then CANCELLED THE DEPOSTIONS AND DID NOT NOTIFY ME.
I have multiple emails over a few weeks asking for information regarding the second deposition.
Also, I was told I was being handed off to another attorney, one who I have never heard of or met to date, who was “handling my case” and was a “genius” and “way smarter than me (Fok).”
All these issues have caused me significant stress especially considering the health issues I face.
Devin and Giovanissa are something else, i'm an immigrant who entered the country in 2022 and as soon as my work permit and social security number were assigned i started looking for work, well, this background checker put a false record on my history and shot themselves in the foot because i was not even here in the country in the year were said things happened. So I found out about Devin and his law firm he was my first and only option and gave them time, patience is the name of the game these guys are cooking at all times even when you feel they are not they are, they call you and keep you posted until you get the good news!! Believe me, Devin and Giovannissa are the best I really appreciate you guys, can't express How much im thankful.
Please read edited section at end of review addressing Attorney's unethical behavior and toothless threats made to his own clients in order to manipulate them.
This review is 100 percent truthful and accurate, and despite the attorney's effirts here to appear as if he is "suing for defamation," the SUBSTANTIAL TRUTH IS AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE TO BOTH DEGAMATION AND LIBEL CLAIMS.
This attorney failed to file multiple, 4 or more, lawsuits by the statute of limitations due to negligence costing me in his own words at least 40 to 60k each.
Some more, with other factors added in, were over six figures likely.
Further, I discovered HE HAS NO INSURANCE AND HAS TOLD NONE OF HIS CLIENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE BAR.
Please if you have used this attorney or are a client you can reach out to me for help.
IF THIS ATTORNEY WORKED WITH YOU WITH NO INSURANCE AND DID NOT TELL YOU IT IS A VIOLATION, UNETHICAL, AND IT VOIDED YOUR FEE SCHEDULE WITH HIM.
He had NO RIGHT TO ANY PERCENTAGE OF YOUR MONEY.
He is STILL WORKING WITH NO INSURANCE.
He also FAILED TO FOLLOW MY WISHES and made two depositions, that HURT US, tanked one case, and is trying to charge me for them, with additional fees just added as punitive measures to try to force me from not pursuing my claim with the bar.
Worst of all, on another case he failed to keep contact, return contact urging him to follow up on a settlement meeting where he gave bad advice based on his lack of knowledge for my case, but then DID NOT ANSWER A MOTION FROM OPPOSING COUNCIL AND MY CASE WAS DISMISSED DUE TO HIS NEGLIGENCE.
Worse he never notified me at all, and then appealed the dismissal without telling me, lost again, and tried to hide this from me and never intended to tell me.
This attorney exhibited sociopathic behavior based on lack of concern for all clients as they can not recover their losses after his bad acts due to not having insurance, and did not tell them.
Any business partner, financial institutions or banks, attorneys working with him, all are at risk do to his behavior.
Again, as during the case when I discovered Mr. Fok had been careless, missed multiple deadlines and filing dates, and due to his errors my case was dismissed as well as an appeal he failed to notify me of - attorneys are required by law and ethics to notify you of substantial issues arising in your case and opposition filings, case dismissal and filing of appeals are certainly paramount in that class - this attorney has taken to threats to his own client to attempt to hide his shortcomings and misdeeds.
Mr. Fok is free to file any claim he wishes, but the court files alone show that the case was dismissed due to his errors, and he has admitted this in writing not only to myself but the California Bar - where the CRU currently has this case.
First off, this is not "Mr. Wilt" as you refer me to.
Seconly, this is no where near a "new" account.
Attorney Fok continues to threaten and intimidate.
As far as ANY person posting ANY negative review of you it is perfectly legal and appropriate one is aware of your transgressions and can provide a valid example of them.
Period.
The truth is a valid defence.
Pethaps YOU should not have folks post false "5 star" reviews or give people "incentives" to do so.
That said, bless your heart.
I too have personal knowledge of Attorney Fok not informing his clients that he did not have insurance. This is a serious violation of the bar statutes.
Attorney Fok has indeed on multiple occasions not met deadlines or responded to the court costing his clients money and resulting in their cases being thrown out.
He also has overcharged clients and threatens his clients should they seek to report him.
What I have read here is very factual.
Attorney has a history of missing deadlines with the court that causes case dismissal due to his error. Communication with this attorney is awful.
I see that Mr. FOK has threatened me.
This review is 100 percent truthful.
I am sure any of the people leaving similar reviews can validate that indeed Mr. Fok has done just this, missed deadlines, statutes of limitations, and failed to respond to opposing parties causing cases to be dismissed.
These actions are also documented on other websites.
Mr. Fok also has abused his power by threatening his own clients with "legal action" should they report him, which is both unethical and illegal.
This can be proved as well.
These threats are meaningless as all I have to do is provide ONE example of this.
And that, is easy.
Stop threatening people and instead do right by your clients.