I’ve had professional experiences with other O’Kelly & Sorohan offices, but the Duluth branch is a different story. My experience highlights three significant areas where this office falls short of Georgia’s legal and ethical standards: Breach of Confidentiality (Rule 1.6): Look at how this office responds to negative reviews. They frequently disclose specific customer information to publicly "attack" or defend themselves. Under Georgia State Bar Rule 1.6, attorneys are prohibited from revealing information relating to the representation of a client. Using a public forum to air client details is an ethical red flag. Lack of Communication (Rule 1.4): We have been dealing with an Earnest Money dispute for months. Raissa Rolim has been consistently unresponsive. When she does reply, it’s a vague "I have to check with a supervisor," followed by weeks of silence. Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4 requires lawyers to keep clients reasonably informed and promptly comply with requests for information. This office has done neither. Withholding Cost Information (O.C.G.A. § 23-3-90): We have repeatedly asked for the specific costs to file an interpleader action so the buyer and seller can reach a settlement. This request has been ignored for months. Under O.C.G.A. § 23-3-90, the holder of funds is supposed to act as a neutral stakeholder. By withholding the cost of the action, the firm is effectively blocking the parties from making an informed decision to settle, unnecessarily dragging out the dispute. If you value transparency, privacy, and basic professional responsiveness, I would strongly suggest using a different firm.
Analyzing Data...